Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Thromb Res ; 2022 Nov 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2245589

ABSTRACT

Severe COVID-19 has been associated with a high rate of thrombotic events but also of bleeding events, particularly when the level of prophylactic anticoagulation was increased. Data on the contribution of platelets to these thrombotic events are discordant between reports, while the involvement of platelets in bleeding events has never been investigated. The objective of the present study was to assess platelet function during the first week of ICU hospitalization in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. A total of 35 patients were prospectively included and blood samples were drawn on day (D) 0, D2 and D7. COVID-19 pneumonia was severe with a median PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 91 [68-119] on D0. Platelets from these patients showed evidence of pre-activation and exhaustion with a significant reduction in the surface expression of GPVI, GPIb and GPIIbIIIa, together with a decrease in serotonin content. Platelets from patients with severe COVID-19 were hyporesponsive with a reduced maximal aggregation response to several platelet agonists and decreased adhesion to immobilized fibrinogen. Aggregation of washed platelets and plasma substitution experiments indicated that a plasma factor was at least partially responsible for this hyporeactivity of platelets. Blood flow experiments showed that severe COVID-19 platelets formed smaller, less stable aggregates on a collagen-coated surface, which could explain why some patients develop bleeding events. These findings should prompt us to carefully evaluate the risks and benefits of high-dose prophylactic anticoagulation, and to decrease the level of anticoagulation once the initial phase of the disease has resolved. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04359992.

2.
Transfusion Clinique et Biologique ; 28(4):S93-S93, 2021.
Article in French | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-1492695

ABSTRACT

L'émergence de SARS-CoV-2 a entraîné un afflux massif de patients à l'hôpital et particulièrement en réanimation créant de nombreux problèmes. L'un d'entre eux est la transfusion, tant du côté de l'EFS (sécurité, collecte et stocks) que du transfuseur (soins habituels et demande spécifique inconnue liée au COVID-19). Un des risques était la pénurie avec nécessité de planifier des restrictions transfusionnelles. Nous avons analysé en parallèle l'activité transfusionnelle dans un CHU ainsi que la collecte et la délivrance au niveau de l'EFS entre le 24/02 et le 31/05/2020 et les avons comparées aux données de 2019. L'activité globale a baissé de 33 % sur la période (arrêt des soins réglés hors urgence ou soins ne pouvant être différés et admissions de 2291 patients COVID-19) alors que la transfusion n'a été réduite que de 17 %. Un total de 237 patients COVID-19 (10,3 %) ont nécessité une transfusion, dont 45 pour hémorragie. Parallèlement, la baisse des dons a été contenue à 11 % avec une discrète augmentation des stocks. La diminution de l'activité ne se traduit que par une baisse modérée de l'activité transfusionnelle, celle-ci dépendant principalement de la chirurgie urgente, des syndromes hémorragiques et de la prise en charge des patients en aplasie chimio-induite ou ayant des pathologies hématologiques. Le confinement a entraîné une diminution des dons par suppression des collectes mobiles mais avec un impact limité sur une courte période par mobilisation des donneurs réguliers. Il n'a pas été observé d'inadéquation entre demande et suppléance et il n'a donc pas été nécessaire de mettre en place des restrictions. (French) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Transfusion Clinique et Biologique is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

3.
Transfusion ; 61(8): 2327-2335, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1307871

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The outbreak of a SARS-CoV-2 resulted in a massive afflux of patients in hospital and intensive care units with many challenges. Blood transfusion was one of them regarding both blood banks (safety, collection, and stocks) and consumption (usual care and unknown specific demand of COVID-19 patients). The risk of mismatch was sufficient to plan blood transfusion restrictions if stocks became limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Analyses of blood transfusion in a tertiary hospital and blood collection in the referring blood bank between February 24 and May 31, 2020. RESULTS: Withdrawal of elective surgery and non-urgent care and admission of 2291 COVID-19 patients reduced global activity by 33% but transfusion by 17% only. Only 237 (10.3) % of COVID-19 patients required blood transfusion, including 45 (2.0%) with acute bleeding. Lockdown and cancellation of mobile collection resulted in an 11% reduction in blood donation compared to 2019. The ratio of reduction in blood transfusion to blood donation remained positive and stocks were slightly enhanced. DISCUSSION: Reduction of admissions due to SARS-CoV-2 pandemic results only in a moderate decrease of blood transfusion. Incompressible blood transfusions concern urgent surgery, acute bleeding (including some patients with COVID-19, especially under high anticoagulation), or are supportive for chemotherapy-induced aplasia or chronic anemia. Lockdown results in a decrease of blood donation by cancellation of mobile donation but with little impact on a short period by mobilization of usual donors. No mismatch between demand and donation was evidenced and no planned restriction to blood transfusion was necessary.


Subject(s)
Blood Banks , Blood Donors , Blood Transfusion , COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Tertiary Care Centers
4.
J Control Release ; 336: 252-261, 2021 08 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1281447

ABSTRACT

Current therapeutic treatments improving the impaired transportation of oxygen in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have been found to be relevant and beneficial for the therapeutic treatment of COVID-19 patients suffering from severe respiratory complications. Hence, we report the preclinical and the preliminary results of the Phase I/II clinical trial of LEAF-4L6715, a liposomal nanocarrier encapsulating the kosmotropic agent trans-crocetin (TC), which, once injected, enhance the oxygenation of vascular tissue and therefore has the potential to improve the clinical outcomes of ARDS and COVID-19 in severely impacted patients. We demonstrated that the liposomal formulation enabled to increase from 30 min to 48 h the reoxygenation properties of free TCs in vitro in endothelial cells, but also to improve the half-life of TC by 6-fold in healthy mice. Furthermore, we identified 25 mg/kg as the maximum tolerated dose in mice. This determined concentration led to the validation of the therapeutic efficacy of LEAF-4 L6715 in a sepsis mouse model. Finally, we report the preliminary outcomes of an open-label multicenter Phase I/II clinical trial (EudraCT 2020-001393-30; NCT04378920), which was aimed to define the appropriate schedule and dosage of LEAF-4L6715 and to confirm its tolerability profile and preliminary clinical activity in COVID-19 patients treated in intensive care unit.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Animals , Carotenoids , Endothelial Cells , Humans , Mice , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Vitamin A/analogs & derivatives
5.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 7(7): ofaa249, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-651101

ABSTRACT

A 56-year-old man presented a particularly severe and multisystemic case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In addition to the common lung and quite common pulmonary embolism and kidney injuries, he presented ocular and intestinal injuries that, to our knowledge, have not been described in COVID-19 patients. Although it is difficult to make pathophysiological hypotheses about a single case, the multiplicity of injured organs argues for a systemic response to pulmonary infection. A better understanding of physiopathology should feed the discussion about therapeutic options in this type of multifocal damage related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

6.
Intensive Care Med ; 46(6): 1089-1098, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-191941

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Little evidence of increased thrombotic risk is available in COVID-19 patients. Our purpose was to assess thrombotic risk in severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: All patients referred to 4 intensive care units (ICUs) from two centers of a French tertiary hospital for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 between March 3rd and 31st 2020 were included. Medical history, symptoms, biological data and imaging were prospectively collected. Propensity score matching was performed to analyze the occurrence of thromboembolic events between non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients. RESULTS: 150 COVID-19 patients were included (122 men, median age 63 [53; 71] years, SAPSII 49 [37; 64] points). Sixty-four clinically relevant thrombotic complications were diagnosed in 150 patients, mainly pulmonary embolisms (16.7%). 28/29 patients (96.6%) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy experienced circuit clotting. Three thrombotic occlusions (in 2 patients) of centrifugal pump occurred in 12 patients (8%) supported by ECMO. Most patients (> 95%) had elevated D-dimer and fibrinogen. No patient developed disseminated intravascular coagulation. Von Willebrand (vWF) activity, vWF antigen and FVIII were considerably increased, and 50/57 tested patients (87.7%) had positive lupus anticoagulant. Comparison with non-COVID-19 ARDS patients (n = 145) confirmed that COVID-19 ARDS patients (n = 77) developed significantly more thrombotic complications, mainly pulmonary embolisms (11.7 vs. 2.1%, p < 0.008). Coagulation parameters significantly differed between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Despite anticoagulation, a high number of patients with ARDS secondary to COVID-19 developed life-threatening thrombotic complications. Higher anticoagulation targets than in usual critically ill patients should therefore probably be suggested.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/metabolism , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Pulmonary Embolism/physiopathology , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/physiopathology , Thrombosis/physiopathology , Aged , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Critical Illness , Female , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , France/epidemiology , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Propensity Score , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Embolism/complications , Pulmonary Embolism/mortality , Pulmonary Embolism/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/complications , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/mortality , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/virology , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/mortality , Thrombosis/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL